Sample case · not a real clientTourism & leisure

A theme park in southwest China (sample)

About 180 on-site staff across 10 departments, including animal care, aquarium life support, guest services, retail and shows.

Adapted from a real cost model (anonymized; client name and personal data removed). Figures are modeled estimates, not measured results.

A theme park in southwest China (sample)AI-generated
−30%Headcount 180 → 126 (incl. 1 new AI ops role, phased)
−27.1%Annual labor cost, approx. ¥12.28M → ¥8.95M
¥2.78MSteady-state net annual saving (modeled, after AI spend)
+42.9%Output per person (same output)
Month 14Modeled cumulative payback

Basis: sample data · modeled (not measured)

Starting point

The owner's three problems

01

Holiday peaks and weekday staffing never match

02

Guest service, ticketing and on-site teams answer the same questions separately

03

Manual daily and weekly reports; daily close reconciled by hand

Process

How we did it

01

Discover

Diagnose, 2–3 weeks: mapped a 180-person org, scored 29 role groups, checked capacity for 16 work pools

02

Build

90-day pilot: guest service and marketing, 5 AI employees running in parallel

03

Adopt & improve

Months 4–12: extended to rides and finance; headcount adjusted in phases after each pool met its guardrails

Scope

Departments, AI employees and workbench modules

Departments

Guest operations (service/ticketing/on-site), marketing, finance, HR & admin, rides, engineering, retail

Workbench modules

Operating cockpit, guest service center, monitoring, daily close, HR

AI employees (agents)

Guest Q&A AgentTicket Router AgentField Log AgentMonitoring AgentReconciliation AgentContent AgentReporting AgentCockpit AgentHR Ops AgentChannel & Order AgentContract Review AgentPolicy & Training AgentScheduling AgentCompliance Check Agent

Results

Leaner · Faster · Stronger

All figures are sample data.

Leaner

−30%Headcount 180 → 126 (incl. 1 new AI ops role, phased)
−27.1%Annual labor cost, approx. ¥12.28M → ¥8.95M
¥2.78MSteady-state net annual saving (modeled, after AI spend)

Faster

+42.9%Output per person (same output)
~1,955 hrs/moInternal communication hours saved (modeled)

Competitive edge

Month 14Modeled cumulative payback

Lower labor cost per visitor at the same service standard; holiday peaks absorbed by AI Q&A and self-service ticketing.

Sample quote
“Guest service used to be three silos. Now one person handles most guest questions — and I see the whole park on my phone every Monday.”
— Project lead (sample quote)

See the Tourism, attractions & hotels playbook →

Run the same numbers for your company

Free diagnostic: on-site interviews, role-by-role AI scoring and a cost model.